LDF is completely independent and separate from the NAACP.  Although LDF can trace its origins back to the NAACP Legal Department, founded in the 1930s by Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall founded LDF as a separate legal entity in 1940 and LDF became completely independent of the NAACP in 1957.  The Legal Defense Fund is the leading U.S. legal organization fighting for racial justice. The first answer was simple. The Fund was home to many of its legal heroes, including Director-Counsel Thurgood Marshall, under whose direction lawyers Brown v. Board of Education and most recently served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In a 1980 case, she sought a change of location for Tommy Lee Hines, a mentally disabled African-American from Decatur, Alabama, who had been convicted of raping an 85-year-old woman.
The defense never raised the issue of Hines` lack of jurisdiction, so the Alabama Supreme Court sent the case back to Decatur for a new trial. Jones, as one of Hines` new lawyers, argued that he could not get a fair trial where he was originally convicted. William Henry Furman had been sentenced to death by the state of Georgia. His gun had discharged as he fled a house he was trying to break into, killing one of the residents. The lawyers challenged the legality of the verdict. The United States Supreme Court sought to consolidate the review of the case with two others in which death sentences could have been arbitrarily enforced. Greenberg hired her as the third member of his team dealing with death penalty cases. The Defence Fund promoted Jones to Director Counsel and Chair in 1993 – the first woman to hold this top leadership position. William T. Coleman Jr., an accomplished lawyer who was the first black man employed by the Supreme Court, was appointed Secretary of Transportation under President Gerald Ford. Coleman, a former president of the Defense Fund, asked Jones to join him as one of his two special assistants.
“I said, `I`m a southerner like you, and I`ve felt the frustrations, but what I`m here for and what I need is much more personal. If I want to pursue a career in the legal field, it depends on the certification of the file. The Defence Fund knew that its appeal would be doomed to failure if heard in the Cullman case. They submitted a second request for a change of location. The NAACP Board of Directors established the Legal Defense Fund in 1940 specifically for tax purposes. In 1957, the DFL was completely separated from the NAACP and given its own independent board of directors and staff.  Although DFL was originally intended to operate in accordance with NAACP policy, serious disputes arose between the two organizations after 1961. These conflicts eventually led the NAACP to create its own in-house legal department, while LDF continued to operate as an independent organization and achieve significant legal victories.   Why did she want this position? What kind of legal work did she want to do? And how much money did she want to make? Perhaps the most famous case in DFL history is Brown v.
Board of Education, the landmark 1954 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly prohibited racial segregation in de jure public educational institutions. During the civil rights protests of the 1960s, the LDF represented “the legal arm of the civil rights movement” and advised Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., among others.  By insisting on the absence of a split, when it came time to negotiate, the Defence Fund got the desired 3-3 split, Jones said. Calling all lawyers! If you want to serve at the NAACP as an election observer, legal counsel, or through quick response, litigation, or phone help, we can help you leverage your power this election season. Since then, from the sidelines, Jones has Fisher v. University of Texas, a Supreme Court case involving the Defense Fund. The case reaffirmed the policy of affirmative action, but nevertheless returned to the forefront.
In Crystal LaVon Mason-Hobbs v. The State of Texas, the Texas State Conference NAACP, and the League of Women Voters of Texas filed an amicus curiae brief with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to protect voter turnout in Texas. In that case, the accused, a sword on probation who did not know she was not allowed to vote, was sentenced to five years in prison for voting provisionally. She was convicted of violating the Illegal Elections Act. Jones` first solo assignment, Research Assistant to the President and Managing Director, was not easy. Greenberg asked her to go to Georgia and see what she could do to move Furman v. Georgia forward. The path to justice requires that we challenge federal, state, and local laws, statutes, and policies to ensure equal protection. The controller tries to deprive Mason of his autonomy. When Mason`s management announced that it would not abandon its charter, the comptroller threatened Mason with a financial takeover, proposing drastic restrictions that did not exist, while Mason was under the previous predominantly white leadership that actually caused the debt.
“I tried my luck in Virginia,” Jones said. “And Virginia took a chance on me. We gave ourselves a chance. Jones said she would later hear from her classmates and sometimes her children what winning these cases meant to her. Through positive litigation, we aim to advance our mission to ensure fair treatment and opportunity in the areas of electoral law, education, economic empowerment, criminal justice, and health, including environmental justice. We sue and join as plaintiffs in state and federal cases. “Your race determined your salary,” Jones said. “I said, `Wait a minute,`” Jones said. `We have to counter this.` “I remember walking out of the court at 9 a.m. that night, and it was pitch black, and on the hill was the clan, in ceremonial dress, about 20 of them surrounding the court,” Jones said. “They had flames.” The only problem was that she couldn`t look in the mirror at Christmas.
She had accepted the position only for the salary.